Friday, August 24, 2012
Exercise -7 (Collections and Generics)
1. Given:
public static void main(String[] args) {
// INSERT DECLARATION HERE
for (int i = 0; i <= 10; i++) {
List<Integer> row = new ArrayList<Integer>();
for (int j = 0; j <= 10; j++)
row.add(i * j);
table.add(row);
}
for (List<Integer> row : table)
System.out.println(row);
}
Which statements could be inserted at // INSERT DECLARATION HERE to allow this code to
compile and run? (Choose all that apply.)A. List<List<Integer>> table = new List<List<Integer>>();
B. List<List<Integer>> table = new ArrayList<List<Integer>>();
C. List<List<Integer>> table = new ArrayList<ArrayList<Integer>>();
D. List<List, Integer> table = new List<List, Integer>();
E. List<List, Integer> table = new ArrayList<List, Integer>();
F. List<List, Integer> table = new ArrayList<ArrayList, Integer>();
G. None of the above
Answer:
B is correct.
A is incorrect because List is an interface, so you can't say new List() regardless of any generic types. D, E, and F are incorrect because List only takes one type parameter (a Map would take two, not a List). C is tempting, but incorrect. The type argument <List<Integer>> must be the same for both sides of the assignment, even though the constructor new ArrayList() on the right side is a subtype of the declared type List on the left. (Objective 6.4)
A is incorrect because List is an interface, so you can't say new List() regardless of any generic types. D, E, and F are incorrect because List only takes one type parameter (a Map would take two, not a List). C is tempting, but incorrect. The type argument <List<Integer>> must be the same for both sides of the assignment, even though the constructor new ArrayList() on the right side is a subtype of the declared type List on the left. (Objective 6.4)
2. Which statements are true about comparing two instances of the same class, given that the equals() and hashCode() methods have been properly overridden? (Choose all that apply.)
A. If the equals() method returns true, the hashCode() comparison == might return false
B. If the equals() method returns false, the hashCode() comparison == might return true
C. If the hashCode() comparison == returns true, the equals() method must return true
D. If the hashCode() comparison == returns true, the equals() method might return true
E. If the hashCode() comparison != returns true, the equals() method might return true
Answer:
B and D. B is true because often two dissimilar objects can return the same hashcode
value. D is true because if the hashCode() comparison returns ==, the two objects might
or might not be equal.
A, C, and E are incorrect. C is incorrect because the hashCode() method is very flexible in its return values, and often two dissimilar objects can return the same hash code value. A and E are a negation of the hashCode() and equals() contract. (Objective 6.2)
A, C, and E are incorrect. C is incorrect because the hashCode() method is very flexible in its return values, and often two dissimilar objects can return the same hash code value. A and E are a negation of the hashCode() and equals() contract. (Objective 6.2)
3. Given:
public static void before() {
Set set = new TreeSet();
set.add("2");
set.add(3);
set.add("1");
Iterator it = set.iterator();
while (it.hasNext())
System.out.print(it.next() + " ");
}
Which statements are true?A. The before() method will print 1 2
B. The before() method will print 1 2 3
C. The before() method will print three numbers, but the order cannot be determined
D. The before() method will not compile
E. The before() method will throw an exception at runtime
Answer:
E is correct. You can't put both Strings and ints into the same TreeSet. Without generics,
the compiler has no way of knowing what type is appropriate for this TreeSet, so it allows
everything to compile. At runtime, the TreeSet will try to sort the elements as they're
added, and when it tries to compare an Integer with a String it will throw a
ClassCastException. Note that although the before() method does not use generics,
it does use autoboxing. Watch out for code that uses some new features and some old
features mixed together.
A, B, C, and D are incorrect based on the above. (Objective 6.5)
A, B, C, and D are incorrect based on the above. (Objective 6.5)
4. Given:
import java.util.*;
class MapEQ {
public static void main(String[] args) {
Map<ToDos, String> m = new HashMap<ToDos, String>();
ToDos t1 = new ToDos("Monday");
ToDos t2 = new ToDos("Monday");
ToDos t3 = new ToDos("Tuesday");
m.put(t1, "doLaundry");
m.put(t2, "payBills");
m.put(t3, "cleanAttic");
System.out.println(m.size());
} }
class ToDos{
String day;
ToDos(String d) { day = d; }
public boolean equals(Object o) {
return ((ToDos)o).day == this.day;
}
// public int hashCode() { return 9; }
}
Which is correct? (Choose all that apply.)A. As the code stands it will not compile
B. As the code stands the output will be 2
C. As the code stands the output will be 3
D. If the hashCode() method is uncommented the output will be 2
E. If the hashCode() method is uncommented the output will be 3
F. If the hashCode() method is uncommented the code will not compile
Answer:
C and D are correct. If hashCode() is not overridden then every entry will go into its own
bucket, and the overridden equals() method will have no effect on determining equivalency.
If hashCode() is overridden, then the overridden equals() method will view t1 and
t2 as duplicates.
A, B, E, and F are incorrect based on the above. (Objective 6.2)
A, B, E, and F are incorrect based on the above. (Objective 6.2)
5. Given:
public class AccountManager {
private Map accountTotals = new HashMap(); //line 13
private int retirementFund;
public int getBalance(String accountName) {
Integer total = (Integer) accountTotals.get(accountName); // line 17
if (total == null)
total = Integer.valueOf(0);
return total.intValue(); // line 20
}
public void setBalance(String accountName, int amount) {
accountTotals.put(accountName, Integer.valueOf(amount)); // line 24
} }
This class is to be updated to make use of appropriate generic types, with no changes in behavior
(for better or worse). Which of these steps could be performed? (Choose three.)A. Replace line 13 with private
Map<String, int> accountTotals = new HashMap<String, int>();
B. Replace line 13 with private
Map<String, Integer> accountTotals = new HashMap<String, Integer>();
C. Replace line 13 with
private Map<String<Integer>> accountTotals = new HashMap<String<Integer>>();
D. Replace lines 17-20 with
int total = accountTotals.get(accountName);
if (total == null) total = 0;
return total;
E. Replace lines 17-20 with
Integer total = accountTotals.get(accountName);
if (total == null) total = 0; return total;
F. Replace lines 17-20 with return accountTotals.get(accountName);
G. Replace line 24 with accountTotals.put(accountName, amount);
H. Replace line 24 with accountTotals.put(accountName, amount.intValue());
Answer:
B, E, and G are correct.
A is wrong because you can't use a primitive type as a type parameter. C is wrong because a Map takes two type parameters separated by a comma. D is wrong because an int can't autobox to a null, and F is wrong because a null can't unbox to 0. H is wrong because you can't autobox a primitive just by trying to invoke a method with it. (Objective 6.4)
A is wrong because you can't use a primitive type as a type parameter. C is wrong because a Map takes two type parameters separated by a comma. D is wrong because an int can't autobox to a null, and F is wrong because a null can't unbox to 0. H is wrong because you can't autobox a primitive just by trying to invoke a method with it. (Objective 6.4)
6. Given:
interface Hungry<E> { void munch(E x); }
interface Carnivore<E extends Animal> extends Hungry<E> {}
interface Herbivore<E extends Plant> extends Hungry<E> {}
abstract class Plant {}
class Grass extends Plant {}
abstract class Animal {}
class Sheep extends Animal implements Herbivore<Sheep> {
public void munch(Sheep x) {}
}
class Wolf extends Animal implements Carnivore<Sheep> {
public void munch(Sheep x) {}
}
Which of the following changes (taken separately) would allow this code to compile?
(Choose all that apply.)
A. Change the Carnivore interface to
interface Carnivore<E extends Plant> extends Hungry<E> {}
B. Change the Herbivore interface to
interface Herbivore<E extends Animal> extends Hungry<E> {}
C. Change the Sheep class to
class Sheep extends Animal implements Herbivore<Plant> {
public void munch(Grass x) {}
}
D. Change the Sheep class to
class Sheep extends Plant implements Carnivore<Wolf> {
public void munch(Wolf x) {}
}
E. Change the Wolf class to
class Wolf extends Animal implements Herbivore<Grass> {
public void munch(Grass x) {}
}
F. No changes are necessary
Answer:
B is correct. The problem with the original code is that Sheep tries to implement
HerbivoresSheep> and Herbivore declares that its type parameter E can be any type that
extends Plant. Since a Sheep is not a Plant, Herbivore<Sheep> makes no sense-
the type Sheep is outside the allowed range of Herbivore's parameter E. Only solutions
that either alter the definition of a Sheep or alter the definition of Herbivore will be able
to fix this. So A, E, and F are eliminated. B works, changing the definition of an Herbivore
to allow it to eat Sheep solves the problem. C doesn't work because an Herbivore<Plant>
must have a munch(Plant) method, not munch(Grass). And D doesn't work, because
in D we made Sheep extend Plant, now the Wolf class breaks because its munch(Sheep)
method no longer fulfills the contract of Carnivore. (Objective 6.4)
7. Which collection class(es) allows you to grow or shrink its size and provides indexed access to its elements, but whose methods are not synchronized? (Choose all that apply.)
A. java.util.HashSet
B. java.util.LinkedHashSet
C. java.util.List
D. java.util.ArrayList
E. java.util.Vector
F. java.util.PriorityQueue
Answer:
D is correct. All of the collection classes allow you to grow or shrink the size of your
collection. ArrayList provides an index to its elements. The newer collection classes
tend not to have synchronized methods. Vector is an older implementation of ArrayList
functionality and has synchronized methods; it is slower than ArrayList.
A, B, C, E, and F are incorrect based on the logic described above; Notes: C, List is an interface, and F, PriorityQueue does not offer access by index. (Objective 6.1)
A, B, C, E, and F are incorrect based on the logic described above; Notes: C, List is an interface, and F, PriorityQueue does not offer access by index. (Objective 6.1)
8. Given a method declared as
public static <E extends Number> List<E> process(List<E> nums)A programmer wants to use this method like this
// INSERT DECLARATIONS HERE output = process(input);Which pairs of declarations could be placed at // INSERT DECLARATIONS HERE to allow the code to compile? (Choose all that apply.)
A. ArrayList<Integer> input = null; ArrayList<Integer> output = null;
B. ArrayList<Integer> input = null; List<Integer> output = null;
C. ArrayList<Integer> input = null; List<Number> output = null;
D. List<Number> input = null; ArrayList<Integer> output = null;
E. List<Number> input = null; List<Number> output = null;
F. List<Integer> input = null; List<Integer> output = null;
G. None of the above
Answer:
B, E, and F are correct.
The return type of process is definitely declared as a List, not an ArrayList, so A and D are wrong. C is wrong because the return type evaluates to List<Integer>, and that can't be assigned to a variable of type List<Number>. Of course all these would probably cause a NullPointerException since the variables are still null-but the question only asked us to get the code to compile. (Objective 6.4)
The return type of process is definitely declared as a List, not an ArrayList, so A and D are wrong. C is wrong because the return type evaluates to List<Integer>, and that can't be assigned to a variable of type List<Number>. Of course all these would probably cause a NullPointerException since the variables are still null-but the question only asked us to get the code to compile. (Objective 6.4)
9. Given the proper import statement(s), and
PriorityQueue<String> pq = new PriorityQueue<String>();
pq.add("2");
pq.add("4");
System.out.print(pq.peek() + " ");
pq.offer("1");
pq.add("3");
pq.remove("1");
System.out.print(pq.poll() + " ");
if(pq.remove("2")) System.out.print(pq.poll() + " ");
System.out.println(pq.poll() + " " + pq.peek());
What is the result?A. 2 2 3 3
B. 2 2 3 4
C. 4 3 3 4
D. 2 2 3 3 3
E. 4 3 3 3 3
F. 2 2 3 3 4
G. Compilation fails
H. An exception is thrown at runtime
Answer:
B is correct. For the sake of the exam, add() and offer() both add to (in this case),
naturally sorted queues. The calls to poll() both return and then remove the first item
from the queue, so the if test fails.
A, C, D, E, F, G, and H are incorrect based on the above. (Objective 6.1)
A, C, D, E, F, G, and H are incorrect based on the above. (Objective 6.1)
10. Given:
import java.util.*;
public class Mixup {
public static void main(String[] args) {
Object o = new Object();
// insert code here line 7
s.add("o");
s.add(o);
}
}
And these three fragments:I. Set s = new HashSet();
II. TreeSet s = new TreeSet();
III. LinkedHashSet s = new LinkedHashSet();
When fragments I, II, or III are inserted, independently, at line 7, which are true? (Choose all that apply.)
A. Fragment I compiles
B. Fragment II compiles
C. Fragment III compiles
D. Fragment I executes without exception
E. Fragment II executes without exception
F. Fragment III executes without exception
Answer:
A, B, C, D, and F are all correct.
Only E is incorrect. Elements of a TreeSet must in some way implement Comparable. (Objective 6.1)
Only E is incorrect. Elements of a TreeSet must in some way implement Comparable. (Objective 6.1)
11. Given:
import java.util.*;
class Turtle {
int size;
public Turtle(int s) { size = s; }
public boolean equals(Object o) { return (this.size == ((Turtle)o).size); }
// insert code here line 8
}
public class TurtleTest {
public static void main(String[] args) {
LinkedHashSet<Turtle> t = new LinkedHashSet<Turtle>();
t.add(new Turtle(1)); t.add(new Turtle(2)); t.add(new Turtle(1));
System.out.println(t.size());
}
}
And these two fragments:I. public int hashCode() { return size/5; }
II. // no hashCode method declared
If fragment I or II is inserted, independently, at line 8, which are true? (Choose all that apply.)
A. If fragment I is inserted, the output is 2
B. If fragment I is inserted, the output is 3
C. If fragment II is inserted, the output is 2
D. If fragment II is inserted, the output is 3
E. If fragment I is inserted, compilation fails
F. If fragment II is inserted, compilation fails
Answer:
A and D are correct. While fragment II wouldn't fulfill the hashCode() contract (as you
can see by the results), it is legal Java. For the purpose of the exam, if you don't override
hashCode(), every object will have a unique hashcode.
B, C, E, and F are incorrect based on the above. (Objective 6.2)
B, C, E, and F are incorrect based on the above. (Objective 6.2)
12. Given the proper import statement(s), and:
TreeSet<String> s = new TreeSet<String>();
TreeSet<String> subs = new TreeSet<String>();
s.add("a"); s.add("b"); s.add("c"); s.add("d"); s.add("e");
subs = (TreeSet)s.subSet("b", true, "d", true);
s.add("g");
s.pollFirst();
s.pollFirst();
s.add("c2");
System.out.println(s.size() +" "+ subs.size());
Which are true? (Choose all that apply.)A. The size of s is 4
B. The size of s is 5
C. The size of s is 7
D. The size of subs is 1
E. The size of subs is 2
F. The size of subs is 3
G. The size of subs is 4
H. An exception is thrown at runtime
Answer:
B and F are correct. After "g" is added, TreeSet s contains six elements and TreeSet subs
contains three (b, c, d), because "g" is out of the range of subs. The first pollFirst()
finds and removes only the "a". The second pollFirst() finds and removes the "b" from
both TreeSets (remember they are backed). The final add() is in range of both TreeSets.
The final contents are [c,c2,d,e,g] and [c,c2,d].
A, C, D, E, G, and H are incorrect based on the above. (Objective 6.3)
A, C, D, E, G, and H are incorrect based on the above. (Objective 6.3)
13. Given:
import java.util.*;
public class Magellan {
public static void main(String[] args) {
TreeMap<String, String> myMap = new TreeMap<String, String>();
myMap.put("a", "apple"); myMap.put("d", "date");
myMap.put("f", "fig"); myMap.put("p", "pear");
System.out.println("1st after mango: " + // sop 1
myMap.higherKey("f"));
System.out.println("1st after mango: " + // sop 2
myMap.ceilingKey("f"));
System.out.println("1st after mango: " + // sop 3
myMap.floorKey("f"));
SortedMap<String, String> sub = new TreeMap<String, String>();
sub = myMap.tailMap("f");
System.out.println("1st after mango: " + // sop 4
sub.firstKey());
}
}
Which of the System.out.println statements will produce the output 1st after mango: p?
(Choose all that apply.)A. sop 1
B. sop 2
C. sop 3
D. sop 4
E. None; compilation fails
F. None; an exception is thrown at runtime
Answer:
A is correct. The ceilingKey() method's argument is inclusive. The floorKey() method
would be used to find keys before the specified key. The firstKey() method's argument is
also inclusive.
B, C, D, E, and F are incorrect based on the above. (Objective 6.3)
B, C, D, E, and F are incorrect based on the above. (Objective 6.3)
14. Given:
import java.util.*;
class Business { }
class Hotel extends Business { }
class Inn extends Hotel { }
public class Travel {
ArrayList<Hotel> go() {
// insert code here line 9
}
}
Which, inserted independently at line 9, will compile? (Choose all that apply.)A. return new ArrayList<Inn>();
B. return new ArrayList<Hotel>();
C. return new ArrayList<Object>();
D. return new ArrayList<Business>();
Answer:
B is correct.
A is incorrect because polymorphic assignments don't apply to generic type parameters. C and D are incorrect because they don't follow basic polymorphism rules. (Objective 6.4)
A is incorrect because polymorphic assignments don't apply to generic type parameters. C and D are incorrect because they don't follow basic polymorphism rules. (Objective 6.4)
15. Given:
import java.util.*;
class Dog { int size; Dog(int s) { size = s; } }
public class FirstGrade {
public static void main(String[] args) {
TreeSet<Integer> i = new TreeSet<Integer>();
TreeSet<Dog> d = new TreeSet<Dog>();
d.add(new Dog(1)); d.add(new Dog(2)); d.add(new Dog(1));
i.add(1); i.add(2); i.add(1);
System.out.println(d.size() + " " + i.size());
}
}
What is the result?A. 1 2
B. 2 2
C. 2 3
D. 3 2
E. 3 3
F. Compilation fails
G. An exception is thrown at runtime
Answer:
G is correct. Class Dog needs to implement Comparable in order for a TreeSet (which
keeps its elements sorted) to be able to contain Dog objects.
A, B, C, D, E, and F are incorrect based on the above. (Objective 6.5)
A, B, C, D, E, and F are incorrect based on the above. (Objective 6.5)
16. Given:
import java.util.*;
public class GeoCache {
public static void main(String[] args) {
String[] s = {"map", "pen", "marble", "key"};
Othello o = new Othello();
Arrays.sort(s,o);
for(String s2: s) System.out.print(s2 + " ");
System.out.println(Arrays.binarySearch(s, "map"));
}
static class Othello implements Comparator<String> {
public int compare(String a, String b) { return b.compareTo(a); }
}
}
Which are true? (Choose all that apply.)A. Compilation fails
B. The output will contain a 1
C. The output will contain a 2
D. The output will contain a -1
E. An exception is thrown at runtime
F. The output will contain "key map marble pen"
G. The output will contain "pen marble map key"
Answer:
D and G are correct. First, the compareTo() method will reverse the normal sort.
Second, the sort() is valid. Third, the binarySearch() gives -1 because it needs to be
invoked using the same Comparator (o), as was used to sort the array. Note that when the
binarySearch() returns an "undefined result" it doesn't officially have to be a -1, but it
usually is, so if you selected only G, you get full credit!
A, B, C, E, and F are incorrect based on the above. (Objective 6.5)
A, B, C, E, and F are incorrect based on the above. (Objective 6.5)
Agni..
Executive,
Talent Sprint
Hyderabad.
for Feedback and Support simply drop a mail in
agni2020{at}gmail.com
Remember to replace the {at} with @ in the email addresses
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)